At some point recently, I started thinking more about this idea of non-linear learning: that most learning happens not as a definitive path from A to B, but as a process of weaving new knowledge into the web of our existing understanding, driven by our current knowledge, motivations, and the real-world situated context of our inquiry.
I wondered if anyone has thought of it from that perspective. I Googled nonlinear learning, and a few of the top results seemed to speak exactly to this idea. For example, this post:
Textbooks, curricula, and our educational system itself are the products of a mechanistic past. School knowledge is pre-determined by a centralized authority, and delivered in alinear format to a mass audience. [...] The act of teaching, then, is seen as transfering information in a controlled sequence, a process that eliminates context - all learners receive the same content in the same format – but fails to accommodate variations in learner needs. [...] Most textbooks stagger information – you can’t proceed to Unit 2 until you’ve learned Unit 1.
In nature, linear learning doesn’t exist. If there is a metpaphor for learning in the natural environment it may be the network rather than the line: our neural networks forms the basis of memory/knowledge and even the brain itself.
Or this post:
When I was a kid [...] I picked what interested me and learned my way through it. It was a nonlinear process, much like a bloodhound follows its nose to sniff out new information.
Nonlinear learning [is] the idea that the learner chooses the sequence in which they learn new material. [...] It’s been discussed in the literature for some time. It’s only in the past few years that tools have emerged to take advantage of a nonlinear approach and put it within reach of educators.
Most online learning remains linear with learner choices limited to “next-page-previous-page.” What nonlinear learning offers is a model based on self-organization of ideas by the learner where [...] “the individual has done the work of putting [ideas] together for himself or herself, and they give rise to new ways to put them together.”
One practical implications of this is that if a learner wants to learn about, let’s say, gravity, the natural learning process is not to provide them with the definitive standard textbook on gravity, but rather help them navigate about this topic and learn exactly what is relevant based on what they already know and why they are interested in learning (are they building a model rocket or dabbling in theory of relativity?). Another implication, is the importance of supporting learners in re-organizing or curating ideas.
You could say that instaGrok’s innovation lies in supporting this type of non-linear learning.